Skip to content Skip to footer

Utah call to actioN

Spread the word!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Email

UTAH – Revisit the DoH Nicotine Cap

current status

Bill
Introduced

Passed
Senate

Passed
House

Signed by
Governor

[Updates pending introduction of legislation]

As of September 1, 2021, it is illegal to sell e-liquids in Utah with nicotine concentrations higher than 24mg/mL for bottles, and 36mg/mL (or ~3%) for pods, cartridges, and other closed system products.

The Department of Health’s rule is carefully worded in an attempt to avoid functioning as a product standard, which is prohibited by federal law. But in practice, regulating sales of products based on levels of specific ingredients is exactly that–a standard.

Please take a moment to make phone calls to the following officials. Take a few minutes to share your thoughts about the nicotine cap and your experience with switching to vaping. If you were successful with an e-liquid that has a nicotine concentration higher than 36mg/mL (or 24mg/mL for bottles), be sure to share that as well.

 

PHONE

EMAIL

SENATE

Jacob Anderegg

801-901-3580

janderegg@le.utah.gov

Curtis S. Bramble

801-361-5802

curt@cbramble.com

Michael K. McKell

801-210-1495

mmckell@le.utah.gov

Evan J. Vickers

435-586-9651

evickers@le.utah.gov

Don L. Ipson

435-817-5281

dipson@le.utah.gov

   

HOUSE

  

Marsha Judkins

801-669-6962

mjudkins@le.utah.gov

Steve Eliason

801-673-4748

seliason@le.utah.gov

Jennifer Dailey-Provost

385-321-7827

jdprovost@le.utah.gov

 

Be sure to also send an email to your officials sharing your concerns with the nicotine rule. You can use the form provided on this page to get connected with your lawmakers. Be sure to edit the pre-written message to include your experience with switching to vaping and, again, include your experience with higher nicotine content products (did they help you quit, did you discover at some point that you needed a higher nicotine strength to fully switch, etc.).

Some points you may want to consider for your comments:

  • Lower-power vapor products require higher concentrations of nicotine in order to appeal to people who smoke and inspire them to switch completely away from combustion.
  • Mandating lower nicotine levels in smoke-free alternatives actually protects the appeal of the most harmful products that rely on combustion. A similar sales ban on cigarettes that actually deliver more nicotine is not being proposed.
  • The so-called “youth vaping epidemic” misrepresents prevalence of use among young people by focusing on the most eye-popping statistics and preys on the public’s misunderstanding of substance use.
  • A low-nicotine mandate may pressure people to travel outside of the state to purchase regular strength closed-system products (i) not supporting local businesses, and (ii) imposing a hidden tax resulting from extra travel expenses. This rule may also inspire people to purchase and consume more e-liquid which is a similar hidden tax as it forces people to spend more money.
  • People will compensate for low-nicotine delivery by consuming more material, exposing themselves to more risk (although still not even close to what they are exposed to by smoking). While some people choose to vape larger volumes of e-liquid, in this case, the UDOH will be making that choice for them.

Read the DoH Nicotine Standard

CASAA Comment on FDA Proposal to Lower Nicotine Content in Cigarrettes

Take Action Now!

We strongly encourage our members to customize the email below and personalize the message. Just click in the text box to make changes!